Although - for obvious reasons - theologians (professional and amateur) do not use the principle of explosion to draw conclusions from such inconsistencies, the many cases allow them to find a Bible quote to support just about any position imaginable, across the spectra of politics, economics, and emotions.įor example, one can quote-mine passages supporting wrath and judgment from the Old Testament, and quotes supporting love and mercy from the New. Wiktionary Advertisement Find Similar Words Find similar words to ex falso quod libet using the buttons below. The Bible contains numerous inconsistencies. Ex Falso Quod Libet Definition Meanings Definition Source Filter The principle or axiom of logic stating that if a contradiction or a false proposition is proven to be true, then it proves that everything is true. one accepts both A) 'Words don't exist.' and B) 'Words do exist.' as premises … which somehow allows for sentences to exist as well as not exist.)Īlternatively, understand that while the syllogism is logically valid, because one of the premises must be false the syllogism is not logically sound and therefore the conclusion cannot be drawn. A review essay on Michel De Vroey, Involuntary Unemployment. So now it has been proven that words don't exist…Įither reject that reasoning behind the principle of explosion (say, by rejecting that disjunction or that disjunctive syllogism) - or - just simply say no to assuming two contradictory premises (otherwise one would have to claim that one accepts yet more contradictions, i.e. THE ERA OF EX FALSO QUODLIBET: AN EXAMPLE. This also appears to be perfectly acceptable here because if it is said that at least one of A or C are true, then when it turns out A is not true (which is B, which has been accepted as a premise), at least it can be held that C is true. P1: All ice cream is frozen or words don't exist. Now use that disjunction for a disjunctive syllogism: (Of which at least the first one is true because it was assumed as a premise.)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |